Backcountry Hunters & Anglers > News > Details

Welcome to BHA’s new website! This digital campfire is still being built—thanks for bearing with us as we get it burning bright.

The Land Doesn't Lie

Tyler Notch

The Land Doesn't Lie

There's something that happens to a person in the backcountry. Noise drops away. Pretense disappears. And what's left is just you, the land, and the truth.

You discover that the land doesn't care about your politics. It doesn't care about your title or your agenda. And for those of us who've built our lives around pursuing it, who plan all year, sacrifice sleep, push our bodies, and invest everything into chasing wild animals in wild places , that land is sacred. Not in a way that's hard to explain to another hunter, but often impossible to explain to anyone else.

That's why what's happening right now keeps me up at night. And it should do the same to you.

I know men and women who dedicated their careers to managing the land we hunt and fish. Not because it made them wealthy. Not because anyone threw them a parade. They took postings in small towns nobody's heard of. They worked in remote areas far from family and comfort. They showed up every day because they believed in something bigger than themselves.

Timo Rova is one of those men. He spent half his life working for the Forest Service and BLM. His wife and daughter still do. When I read his words recently, they stopped me cold:

"We worked not to get rich, not for prestige and often had to work in small towns and remote locations. We worked, and I mean ‘we’ as in my co-workers and me, because we believed in the idea of public lands and science-based resource management. We believed in our work and loved the feeling of getting that work done and the land and ecosystem being better because of our work."

That is a person who has been managing your deer woods. Your trout streams. Your grouse coverts. Your backcountry drainages. Your duck marshes. And there are thousands more Timos. People who love the land and water. People who believed in it. People who did it not for what they could get out of it, but for what they could give to it.

When people like Timo start sounding the alarm, I listen.

Here's what most of us don't think about when we're filling out applications, dropping pins on OnX, or planning next season's hunt: the infrastructure behind the access. The decades of research that inform watershed health. The science that drives understanding of forest composition, fire behavior, and how it all connects to the habitat that holds the wildlife we pursue. The local experts know a specific drainage, a specific marsh, a specific ridgeline better than anyone alive, because they've spent decades studying it.

That infrastructure doesn't just support elk. It supports every white-tailed deer in the northern forests. Every brook trout is holding in a cold stream. Every grouse in the copse of aspen. Every duck in the potholes. Every black bear, every moose, every walleye swimming in water that stays clean because someone was paying attention to the watershed above it.

Wildlife doesn't care about agency org charts. But wildlife absolutely depends on the decisions those agencies make, and on those decisions being grounded in real science, real knowledge, and real experience on the ground.

When you lose half your agency workforce in a single year, you don't just lose headcount. You lose the knowledge that doesn't live in any file or database. You lose the person who's been monitoring that specific migration corridor for decades. You lose the researcher who spent fifteen years understanding how a northern peatland absorbs water, and what happens to the fishery downstream when that system starts to break down.

That knowledge doesn't transfer. It doesn't relocate. It walks out the door and takes something irreplaceable with it.

Timo put it plainly: "These moves will hurt rural America in terms of jobs and good work being done and increase the opportunity for public lands to become private, or at least for management decisions to be decided by industry."

Management decisions made not by science or stewardship but by industry. The next time you glass a hillside or wade a stream, ask yourself who made sure you were allowed to be there, and who made sure there was something worth showing up for.

Here's what I also know about Timo, and this is important. He's not someone who resists change for the sake of resisting it. He told me he still believes an adjustment away from politics at the higher levels was needed, that science should come first. He's not defending a broken status quo.

But there's a difference between reform and demolition. There's a difference between making an institution better and simply making it smaller, faster, cheaper, and calling it progress.

"I feel and think these moves are terrible, politically driven, and science-denying," he said. And when a man who spent his career inside these agencies, who believes in reform, looks at what's happening and calls it science-denying? That's not a political statement. That's a professional one. That's someone who knows exactly what's being lost. The outdoor industry loves to talk about public lands. Everybody's got a logo. Everybody's got a hashtag. Conservation language fills Instagram captions and gear catalogs from September through November and then goes quiet.

That's not leadership. That's marketing.

Leadership means saying the hard thing when it matters. It means caring about what happens to these places twenty years from now when the habitat has shifted, the research that could have protected it is gone, and the agencies that managed it have been hollowed out. It means being willing to stand in the gap between the noise and the truth and say, clearly, without flinching, this matters and here's why.

That voice is missing in the outdoor world right now. Badly missing.

We have no shortage of people who love the lifestyle. The gear, the kills, the content, the community. There's nothing wrong with any of that. But a lifestyle is not a legacy. And if we love this life as much as we say we do, we have an obligation that goes beyond the harvest. I built a lifestyle around the outdoors because I believe the hunting and fishing life is a life of growth. The mountain demands it. The water teaches it. The wild places we love have a way of showing you exactly who you are and exactly who you need to become.

But growth requires something to grow into. It requires ground worth fighting for. It requires wild things worth pursuing. It requires the kind of long-term stewardship that doesn't happen by accident, it happens because people who care are paying attention, doing the work, and protecting what matters before it's gone.

The wildlife won't care about our excuses. The streams won't accept our apologies when they are too polluted to hold fish. The backcountry doesn't forgive neglect.

And the generation of hunters and anglers coming behind us won't forgive our silence if we had something to say and chose to stay quiet because it felt complicated.

This is the moment that separates the people who love the lifestyle from the people who love the land.

Be the second kind.

Previous Article 1.75 Miles of Fence Removed on the Rio Puerco
Print
15

Tyler NotchTyler Notch

Other posts by Tyler Notch
Contact author

Contact author

x