Montana Take Action: Nez Perce-Clearwater Forest Plan Revision

Our Idaho neighbors are currently undergoing a Forest Plan revision for the Nez Perce-Clearwater National Forest. Last written in 1987, this plan is overdue for some guidance, and will guide the direction of the Forest for the next 20-30 years.

Our Montana members are acutely aware of how these Idaho decisions will impact us here in Montana, specifically in the area of the 275,000-acre Great Burn Recommend Wilderness that saddles Idaho and Montana, representing some of the largest remaining intact roadless areas in the continental US.

thumbnail.jpgImage courtesy of Walker Conyngham

Looking at the proposals being considered, this entire Idaho portion of the Great Burn and the valuable habitat it provides for mountain goats, westslope cutthroats, wolverines, elk and more are at risk. And recognizing that the critters we like to chase know nothing about state boundaries, it's time for Montanans to SPEAK UP!

The Montana Chapter submitted five pages of comments (found here), and we encourage you to submit your own before the April 20th, 2020 deadline. Below are some simple talking points to consider as you draft your own comments, which you can submit HERE.

  • Allowing motorized use in the Great Burn would negatively impact our goat and wolverine populations, among other wildlife concerns

  • Hunters, in particular, care about these two species because 1) we'd like to see mountain goats on the Montana side thrive to the point of sustaining a huntable population and 2) as a candidate to be listed as a Threatened Species under the Endangered Species Act, it's in everyone's best interests to provide habitat security for the wolverine

  • Shrinking or eliminating any of the Recommended Wilderness could open up the Great Burn to road building and increased resource extraction that would threaten and forever alter this important habitat and landscape

  • Increasing winter motorized use and removing Recommended Wilderness on the Idaho side will certainly increase the likelihood of the Lolo National Forest doing the same on the Montana side, which is another reason to oppose this

  • Both sustaining healthy numbers of wild westslope cutthroat trout (and close enough for Montanans to catch them), the South Fork and Kelly Creek in particular should both be considered for Wild & Scenic river designations

Great_Burn_map_showing_snowmobile_areas-page-001.jpg

Map courtesy of Brad Smith

In short, we believe the Idaho portion of Great Burn should be left as it was planned in 1987 Forest Plan, not shrunken or opened to motorized use, and we'd appreciate if you took a few minutes to echo our concerns or voice your own.


Thanks for speaking up for your wild public lands and waters!

 

Sincerely,

The Montana Chapter of Backcountry Hunters & Anglers

About Montana BHA Chapter

See other posts related to montana issues