Minnesota Issues

Minnesota BHA Comments on Elk Management Plan

elk hunt 2011 010 2TO: Dept. of Natural Resources (DNR) Big-Game Program Coordinator, Leslie McInenly

September 10, 2014

Dear Leslie:

Minnesota Backcountry Hunters & Anglers (BHA) are a grassroots group of sportsmen and women who are united by a passion to protect and conserve the public lands, forests, mountains, prairies, streams, lakes and game that support our hunting and angling traditions. 

BHA was founded around an Oregon campfire in 2004 by seven sportsmen and women and now has members in all 50 states, with 17 chapters across the country and Canada, including Minnesota, New York and Pennsylvania, and just about every Western state. Partly as a result of our western roots, we know that when a hunter dreams of a trophy elk thoughts run to frozen mornings deep in the Rocky Mountains. Minnesota seldom comes to mind, but that could (and should) change.[1] As you know, Minnesota’s native elk were originally distributed over most of the state, but were extirpated by the early l900s.[2]

Local view: Keep public land for recreation

 

northern bwca

 Help BHA keep public lands public.

By David Lien

Duluth News Tribune: 7/17/14

In 1887 Theodore Roosevelt founded the Boone and Crockett Club with fellow sportsmen. The group later became Roosevelt’s brain trust of “hunter-conservationists” during his presidential crusade to preserve habitat for elk, deer, buffalo and other species among America’s vast wild places and wide-open spaces. Roosevelt’s work as a “conservation president” was one of many ways he left lasting imprints on the nation.

However, today, Roosevelt’s public-lands legacy is being put at risk. Recently, the U.S. House of Representatives passed a budget engineered by U.S. Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., that supports selling “unneeded acreage” of federal land on the open market.

Hunters, anglers, and other outdoorsmen and outdoors-women are intimately familiar with our public lands. We know that the possible sale or transfer of federal public lands used for hunting, fishing, camping and hiking will only serve to enrich a few at the expense of many and eliminate access to our public lands and waters. These are lands set aside “for the greatest good of the greatest number for the longest time,” as Gifford Pinchot, first director of the United States Forest Service (appointed by Teddy Roosevelt), said.

Minnesota BHA Op-Ed: Sulfide Mining Bad For Watersheds and Local Economies

BWCAThe following is an Op-Ed that was originally published in the Grand Rapids Herald-Review on 5/13/14.

In 1909 President Theodore Roosevelt established the Superior National Forest, which today encompasses some 3 million acres including 445,000 acres of surface water.[1] In total, Minnesota claims 10,000—some even say 14,000—lakes. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service reports that anglers spent $2.4 billion in Minnesota in 2011 supporting 35,000 state jobs.[2] Water, wetlands, rivers, lakes and streams are nearly synonymous with our state, particularly in northeastern Minnesota. What a special inheritance!

In the words of Minnesota DNR Commissioner, Tom Landwehr: “The canoe paddle in your hands dips into glassy water near Ely. A loon call breaks the quiet. Seeing the sunrise through aspen trees, your canoe loaded with fishing and camping gear, you realize … We are blessed in Minnesota to have an abundance of natural resources. Minnesotans love them as do our visitors. So do our children when we explore our state with family, and so do anglers.”[3]

MN BHA Comments on Enbridge Sandpiper Pipeline

April 4, 2014                                         

BWCA-northernTO: Larry Hartman, Environmental Review Manager, EERA Minnesota Department of Commerce (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.)

FROM: Minnesota Backcountry Hunters & Anglers

SUBJ: Enbridge Sandpiper Pipeline Comments-PUC Docket Number (13-474)

 

Dear State Agency Leaders:

Minnesota Backcountry Hunters & Anglers (BHA)—The Sportsman's Voice for Our Wild Public Lands, Waters and Wildlife—are a grassroots group of sportsmen and women who are united by a passion to protect and conserve the public lands, forests, mountains, prairies, streams, and lakes that support our hunting and angling traditions.

Nationally, BHA has members in all 50 states and seeks to ensure America’s outdoor heritage in a natural setting, through education and work on behalf of clean water and wildlands. Founded in 2004, BHA is a 501c3 non-profit organization that works to conserve big, natural habitat and healthy rivers and streams. We work so our kids and grandkids are able to enjoy the high-quality hunting and fishing we cherish (www.backcountryhunters.org).

Sportsmen against sulfide mining

northern bwcaThe following op-ed originaly appeared in the Grand Rapids Herald Review on February 4, 2014.

PolyMet is one of several companies considering sulfide mining operations in northeastern Minnesota. During recent public meetings in Duluth, Aurora, and St. Paul on the PolyMet Mining NorthMet Project Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement (SDEIS), mining companies sent busloads of sulfide mining supporters to make a show of force, but most of the substantive testimony came from mine opponents.

Hunters and anglers are particularly concerned about the impacts of sulfide mining. “I’m an outdoorsman, and I’m concerned about water quality,” said Jim Juntti of Barnum. “I asked them what the plan is if something happens and that (tailings basin) opens up and things go bad … They didn’t really have an answer for me.” The Minnesota DNR Division of Fish and Wildlife said the project will definitely affect fish and wildlife, noting that “this increase in risk to water quality and fish habitat is a significant impact of the project.”

That’s because when sulfides interact with oxygen (in our air) and water (in rain or snowmelt, for example), they create sulfuric acid—the same caustic substance used in car batteries. A common term for this pollution is Acid Mine Drainage (AMD), which will continue as long as sulfides, water, and air mix. No new technologies have emerged that can stop the chemical reaction once it begins. Sulfide mining in water-intensive areas has never been done without contaminating waterways and watersheds.

Letter to MN DNR: Sulfide Mining Proposal Harmful to Hunting & Fishing

January 27, 2014                                               

bwca-buckTO: Lisa Fay, Minnesota DNR SDEIS Manager

FROM: Minnesota Backcountry Hunters & Anglers

SUBJ: PolyMet Mining’s NorthMet Project Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement (SDEIS)/Northern Minnesota Sulfide Mining Proposals

Dear Federal and State Agency Leaders:

Minnesota Backcountry Hunters & Anglers (BHA) are a grassroots group of sportsmen and women who are united by a passion to protect and conserve the public lands, forests, mountains, prairies, streams, and lakes that support our hunting and angling traditions.

Nationally we seek to ensure America’s outdoor heritage in a natural setting, through education and work on behalf of clean water and wilderness. Founded in 2004, BHA is a 501c3 non-profit organization that works to conserve big, natural habitat and healthy rivers and streams. We work so our kids and grandkids are able to enjoy the high-quality hunting and fishing we cherish (www.backcountryhunters.org).

Hunters & Anglers Oppose Northern Minnesota Sulfide Mining Proposals

 “To me the biggest thing is this whole question about
500 years of pollution for 20 years of jobs.”

–Paul Austin1

The Minnesota chapter of Backcountry Hunters & Anglers (BHA) is concerned about proposed sulfide mining operations in northern Minnesota. The two foreign-owned sulfide mining operations include PolyMet’s mine near Hoyt Lakes and the Duluth Metals/Twin Metals mine southeast of Ely adjacent to the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness (BWCAW).

Much of the debate surrounding sulfide mining revolves around whether companies have adequate bankruptcy-proof financial assurances in place to cover cleanup costs when (not if) acidmine drainage (AMD) occurs. This is no small issue. PolyMet’s proposed mine, for example, is within the Partridge River watershed, a headwater tributary of the St. Louis River, which enters Lake Superior at Duluth. The Twin Metals mine project would be about two or three miles from the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness (BWCAW). The ore body to be mined is adjacent to the South Kawishiwi River, along both sides of scenic Highway 1, and under Birch Lake.2

In response: What the metals-mining lobbyist left out of column speaks volumes

The following article was recently posted in the Duluth News Tribune

A Washington, D.C.-based mining lobbyist wrote in the News Tribune this month that, “America’s lengthy and uncertain permitting process” is swaying investors to “seek out foreign mineral projects that can be swiftly approved.” The lobbyist, Hal Quinn, president and CEO of the National Mining Association, also weighed in with some questionable jobs numbers forecast for a northern Minnesota sulfide mining project being proposed by Twin Metals (Mining industry’s view: “Let mining boost state manufacturing,” Aug. 11).

By: David A. Lien, Duluth News Tribune

Gorka BWCAA Washington, D.C.-based mining lobbyist wrote in the News Tribune this month that, “America’s lengthy and uncertain permitting process” is swaying investors to “seek out foreign mineral projects that can be swiftly approved.” The lobbyist, Hal Quinn, president and CEO of the National Mining Association, also weighed in with some questionable jobs numbers forecast for a northern Minnesota sulfide mining project being proposed by Twin Metals (Mining industry’s view: “Let mining boost state manufacturing,” Aug. 11).

Of course, what the mining lobbyist didn’t say spoke volumes about how much he really cares about Minnesota and long-term jobs in the state. He didn’t say Twin Metals is owned by Canada-based Duluth Metals and Chilean-based Antofagasta, and they’re pushing for a massive underground sulfide mine southeast of Ely along Minnesota Highway 1 and the Kawishiwi River.

He didn’t say that most of the demand for copper, nickel and myriad other sulfide metals is coming from China. Metals will be extracted and exported to China, and the executives of foreign corporations will profit handsomely. He didn’t say the Twin Metals mine project would be within three miles of the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness.

Letter to International Joint Commission: Sulfide Mining Proposals

July 7, 2013                                                       

TO: International Joint Commission

FROM: Minnesota Backcountry Hunters & Anglers

SUBJ: Northern Minnesota Sulfide Mining Proposals

Dear Commissioners:

bwca-buck3Minnesota Backcountry Hunters & Anglers (BHA) are a grassroots group of sportsmen and women who are united by a passion to protect and conserve the public lands, forests, mountains, prairies, streams, and lakes that support our hunting and angling traditions.

Nationally we seek to ensure America’s outdoor heritage in a natural setting, through education and work on behalf of clean water and wilderness. Founded in 2004, BHA is a 501c3 non-profit organization that works to conserve big, natural habitat and healthy rivers and streams. We work so our kids and grandkids are able to enjoy the high-quality hunting and fishing we cherish ( http://www.backcountryhunters.org). 

We respectfully request that the International Joint Commission (IJC) examine and report upon the water-related impacts from sulfide mining exploration and development within the Rainy River and Lake Superior Basins. We also request that the IJC make recommendations which would assist governmental bodies in both countries in ensuring that the provisions of Article IV of the Boundary Waters Treaty of 1909 are honored.

The Boundary Waters Treaty of 1909 provides the principles and mechanisms to resolve and prevent disputes, particularly those concerning water quantity and quality, along the boundary between Canada and the United States. Article IV of the Treaty states, “It is further agreed that the waters herein defined as boundary waters and waters flowing across the boundary shall not be polluted on either side to the injury of health or property on the other.”

Help us help you

Our Mission

Backcountry Hunters & Anglers seeks to ensure North America's outdoor heritage of hunting and fishing in a natural setting, through education and work on behalf of wild public lands and waters.

Bookmark This

Follow Us

Member Login